Jaco stands for Judicial Appointments and conduct Ombudsman, another grand sounding quango headed by another overpaid grandee, who does bugger all but rubber stamp whatever his drones tell him.
As I was getting nowhere with the oafs at OJC, I had to waste more time with this useless mob of tossers, and I duly filled in their Complaint form on the 26/1/10. I said that the OJC had dealt with my complaint in a slack way with letters and emails of mine going astray and unanswered, and that their behaviour smacked of protectionism of the judiciary.
That the case worker on my case clearly could not understand what I was complaining about by continually saying I was part of the hearing and that it was 'my case', when I had no case, but was complaining about what Hobbs had said about me at that hearing brought by a third party. That she kept saying that I was complaining about a decision, when no decision had been made. That she seemed incapable of understanding why my complaint had taken so long to be made, and had dismissed it as being out of time, when there is provision to ask for it to still be heard.
I expected Hobbs to be brought to book for breaking the rules for Judges over being biased, giving legal advice to an applicant and making slanderous remarks about a third party not connected to the case in front of him.
After sending this off I then entered a time warp of over six months when all that happened was I got a succession of letters off them making excuses for nothing happening. On the 15th Feb I sent another letter in which I had to remind them of how the OJC had not done their job properly by continually misreading my complaints. That the complaint was about how Hobbs had broken the Rules of a Judge at an appeal hearing.
I then got a further SIX LETTERS making excuses for delays etc and it was not until the 15th of July that I actually got the decision letter from this quango boss Sir John Brigstocke KCB. Another typical Establishment tosser with his KCB's and his knighthood. I can just imagine how he ponces around with those two badges, in society. God how I hate the British for their love of
pageantry and robes of ermine, wigs and swords and Sirs and Lords etc. Justice, well that can go hang especially if it's a peasant trying to get it.
So what did this waste of space have to say, and bear in mind HE ACTUALLY PLAYED NO PART IN ANY INVESTIGATION as he is merely a figure head. He said that my complaint that it was not being accepted that I could complain because it was out of time was justified as the OJC had not sent my complaint on that score to the Lord Chancellor as it was required to do.
However there would be no redress as even if that had been done there were no issues of misconduct. So all those airy fairy "Rules for judicial persons holding hearings" meant nothing. This is like saying that the speeding laws do not apply to Judges or any other Judicial persons.
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I MEAN WHEN I SAY THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT WILL BLATANTLY IGNORE WHATEVER RULES AND LAWS THERE ARE IF IT MEANS THAT BY APPLYING THEM TO THEIR ILK, WILL RESULT IN THEIR OWN KIND BEING CHARGED WITH ANYTHING. Of course we cannot have our ruling classes being found guilty of any kind of misconduct as that would give the wrong impression to the workers, the peasants of society, who have to be ruled by the Establishment. THE UTTER AND COMPLETE SHOWER OF BASTARDS THEY ALL ARE.
This Hobbs bastard was clearly in breach of those rules that I outlined in above posts and no one independent of the establishment could or would say he was not.
Included with this letter was a report which purported to have been made by Brigstocke but which I am sure will have been done by one of his minions as was the second report also included and authored by a Natalie Day, a drone case worker. This is what you get with these time wasting civil servants. Months of writing out pages and pages of waffle which are all designed to cover the arses of their own useless existence.
In essence this report by Day was a 13 page ramble which did little more than repeat all what I had said in my various letters to the OJC and what I had complained about, and what letters and emails the OJC had sent in reply. Day included a few of her own views which all were arse covering statements designed purely to let off the actions and conclusions of the case OJC worker Kumalo.
One has to look at the first paragraph of this vacuous document to see that these people cannot get anything right. It says; "The appeal was brought by the "Busbridge brothers" in relation to Mr Cook's ownership of what he considered to be his trademark"
IN FACT the appeal was NOT BROUGHT BY THE BUSBRIDGE BROTHERS AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!! and the fact is that the appeal was brought by only one brother, R.Busbridge. If they cannot read my complaint properly and get one small fact right, how is one supposed to believe that they have got anything right.
Another mistake this short sentence makes is that the application by RB for an appeal had nothing to do with my registration of what undoubedly was MY TRADE MARK as I had registration. He was appealing the decision of the IPO in 2005, that he should lose this registration due to the unlawful application to register and other unlawful actions by him. So this was yet another mistake made by JACO in understanding the history I gave them in my complaint letter of the 5/9/09. And they no doubt do not agree that they are incompetent.
In a nutshell the OJC had said I was out of time, but even if I had been 'In Time' my complaint would still have been kicked out. That whatever Hobbs had said they could not look into that, one way or the other as he was making a decision. That I had not given them evidence that Hobbs had slandered me. These were the only two excuses they could dream up for knocking my complaint back.
My assertions that Hobbs was not making decisions was ignored and if they had read the transcript they could see that this hearing was NO NORMAL APPEAL HEARING and I should know how an appeal hearing is conducted. I say that this appeal hearing was no more than a put up job designed purely for the IPO through James the Head of the IPO Tribunal Section and Hobbs and Busbridge to discuss case law and give RB advice as to how to get out of the renegade IPO hearing officer Landau's decision of 2005, that RB had to lose his registration.
I SAY THAT ANY OBJECTIVE, FAIR MINDED AND INDEPENDENT MINDED PERSON, WHO HAD SOME OF THE PRIOR HISTORY OF THE LANDAU DECISION, WHO THEN READ THE TRANSCRIPT OF THIS APPEAL HEARING, COULD COME TO NO OTHER DECISION THAT IT WAS A PUT UP JOB AND BIASED TOWARDS RB AND SLANDEROUS ABOUT ME.
Of course all my other complaints about OJC and their incompetence were ignored and even though they upheld my complaint that I was legally right to be able to still complain out of time as I had legitimate reasons, it was no more than hollow words. "We made a mistake, but your tough luck mate."
Brigstockes letter is just another whitewash in support of Days letter and reasoning. Rubber stamping what she had said. In particular he made much of the fact that I did not give further details of my complaint that Hobbs had been guilty of personal bad conduct. This of course is a blatant lie as my original complaint laid out in FULL what he had said and why I looked upon that as slanderous against me. I had told the case worker that I had already given the fullest details and she should read the transcript, even if she says she did not need to. Yet now they are using this as an excuse to whitewash it all by accusing me of not providing the clarification asked for. I could give them no more information than I had already done and that had been more than enough to show Hobbs committed misconduct by slandering me.
As a sop to me Bristocke did say that the OJC in their handling of my complaint had been guilty of 'some shortcomings' and delays but as is always the case with the civil service they always brush that aside by inferring it was not important enough. How many times I have seen that happen. The civil service incompetents in being Judge AND Jury ALWAYS LET THEMSELVES OFF!
So all in all I wasted about 18 months with these absolute Tossers, the OJC & the JACO.
I HAVE REPORTED ALL THIS TO KENNETH CLARKE, BUT HE IS AS BIG A TOSSER AS THIS MOB AND A MONTH DOWN TH LINE HE OR HIS STAFF HAVEN'T EVEN ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF MY LETTER LET ALONE SAID THEY WILL LOOK INTO IT. EVEN IF HE DID I WILL GIVE YOU 100-1 AS TO WHAT WOULD NOT HAPPEN.
I HAVE EVEN ASKED MY LOCAL MP CHRIS CHOPE (AN EX BARRISTER AS IS CLARKE)
AND HE HAS A HISTORY OF DOING SOD ALL, SO AGAIN ONE GETS NOWHERE IN THIS SHIT PILE OF A COUNTRY WHERE JUSTICE FOR ORDINARY FOLK IS NON EXISTENT!!